🔗 Share this article

Internationally, states are investing enormous sums into the concept of “sovereign AI” – building domestic AI technologies. From Singapore to Malaysia and Switzerland, countries are vying to develop AI that understands native tongues and cultural specifics.

The Worldwide AI Arms Race

This initiative is a component of a broader global race dominated by large firms from the United States and the People's Republic of China. Whereas firms like a leading AI firm and a social media giant allocate substantial funds, developing countries are also taking sovereign bets in the artificial intelligence domain.

Yet amid such vast investments in play, can developing states secure significant gains? According to a analyst from an influential thinktank, Except if you’re a rich state or a large corporation, it’s quite a burden to build an LLM from the ground up.”

National Security Concerns

Numerous nations are unwilling to use foreign AI systems. Across India, as an example, Western-developed AI systems have at times been insufficient. One instance featured an AI tool deployed to instruct students in a remote village – it communicated in the English language with a thick American accent that was hard to understand for regional students.

Then there’s the national security aspect. For India’s security agencies, relying on particular foreign systems is seen as not permissible. Per an developer commented, There might be some unvetted data source that could claim that, such as, a certain region is not part of India … Utilizing that certain model in a defence setup is a major risk.”

He added, “I have spoken to people who are in defence. They want to use AI, but, disregarding specific systems, they don’t even want to rely on Western systems because information may be transferred abroad, and that is absolutely not OK with them.”

Homegrown Efforts

In response, several states are supporting local projects. An example such a effort is underway in the Indian market, where an organization is attempting to build a national LLM with government backing. This initiative has dedicated roughly 1.25 billion dollars to artificial intelligence advancement.

The founder imagines a model that is more compact than top-tier models from Western and Eastern corporations. He states that India will have to offset the financial disparity with expertise. “Being in India, we don’t have the option of investing huge sums into it,” he says. “How do we compete with say the enormous investments that the US is investing? I think that is where the core expertise and the brain game comes in.”

Local Priority

Throughout the city-state, a government initiative is funding language models developed in south-east Asia’s local dialects. Such dialects – including the Malay language, Thai, the Lao language, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and additional ones – are frequently poorly represented in US and Chinese LLMs.

I hope the individuals who are developing these independent AI systems were conscious of the extent to which and the speed at which the leading edge is progressing.

A senior director participating in the project says that these systems are designed to enhance larger models, as opposed to displacing them. Tools such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he states, commonly struggle with native tongues and local customs – communicating in awkward Khmer, for instance, or proposing pork-based dishes to Malay consumers.

Building local-language LLMs enables local governments to incorporate cultural nuance – and at least be “informed users” of a advanced technology created overseas.

He further explains, I am prudent with the term national. I think what we’re attempting to express is we wish to be more accurately reflected and we aim to grasp the abilities” of AI platforms.

Multinational Cooperation

Regarding nations attempting to carve out a role in an growing international arena, there’s another possibility: join forces. Analysts affiliated with a prominent policy school have suggested a government-backed AI initiative shared among a consortium of middle-income states.

They refer to the proposal “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, drawing inspiration from the European effective play to develop a competitor to Boeing in the 1960s. Their proposal would entail the formation of a public AI company that would combine the resources of various countries’ AI initiatives – for example the United Kingdom, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, Germany, the nation of Japan, Singapore, South Korea, the French Republic, Switzerland and the Kingdom of Sweden – to develop a competitive rival to the American and Asian giants.

The main proponent of a study outlining the initiative notes that the idea has attracted the consideration of AI officials of at least a few countries so far, along with several national AI organizations. Although it is currently targeting “developing countries”, less wealthy nations – Mongolia and Rwanda among them – have also indicated willingness.

He explains, Currently, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s less trust in the promises of this current American government. Experts are questioning such as, can I still depend on such systems? Suppose they choose to